User talk:Eyagi

Collection of Imperial Japanese Military Comfort Station Regulation

Source and license, please?--Jusjih (talk) 03:48, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

"source" is listed by heading. All content is published online. Please check the article. Eyagi (talk) 08:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi. I'm afraid you don't understand the questions. On your user page you wrote "The content is a compilation... This is the first time to post." and then here above "All content is published online". Questions:

1 has the compilation (so as on the sandbox) ever been published somewhere? If yes, we need a link on it as it is the source. And wo is the author of the compilation?

2 we need a link to the page where we can see the text in this form (compilation) is in the public domain

3 who is the author of the compilation, and if translated, who is the translator?

4 is the translation in the public domain as well, pls a link

The Wikisource has special regulations. Cheers -jkb- (talk) 15:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

See also the copyright discussion.--Jusjih (talk) 20:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

The answer to 1 is no. The author of the compilation and the translator from Japanese to English is me. Eyagi (talk) 01:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi Eyagi. Yep, it is what I was afraid it will happen. No chance to publish it here at Wikisource. Concerning the sandbox: keep in mind that everybody can use the page, i.e. every text can be deleted there any time. Cheers -jkb- (talk) 16:44, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. This point applies to all wiki articles, doesn't it? Eyagi (talk) 02:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

For all wikis there is the following principle: copyvios i.e. violations of the copyright are prohibited in any case and will be deleted. -jkb- (talk) 17:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

I understand the meaning of the comment. This case is uploaded by the sandbox author himself, so it's not a copyright violation. Eyagi (talk) 01:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi Eyagi, please do not misuse our pages, even if the sandbox. Your text cannot be published here: it is not appropriate here, as it was never been published before in exactly the same wording. The Wikisource is not for first publishing. I'm sorry but I have to delete it again. You need some other blog. Cheers, -jkb- (talk) 15:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

I thought this article was just a collection of the distributed regulations, with no room for personal thought, and fit the purpose of the wikisource. The wikisource inclusion policy says "Previously unpublished scientific research, regardless of being peer reviewed or not, is acceptable to include in Wikisource, if an author meets Wikipedia: Notability and the work is released under a Wikisource compatible license". This article has notability. Where does it say "it was never published before in exactly the same wording" as the basis for your deletion? Eyagi (talk) 04:41, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

I just proposed moving your collection to your user subpage. Please reply at the copyright discussion.--Jusjih (talk) 19:39, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Do you believe that these materials constitute a copyright violation?　As I have already explained, these materials are government publications written in Japanese and English that are in the public domain, and I understand that these copyrights are free. Is my interpretation incorrect? Eyagi (talk) 08:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Are you misunderstanding? The origin of these materials was the military regulations prepared by the Japanese military, and they were all in Japanese.

These Japanese materials seized by the US military on the battlefield during the war were translated into English by US military. I translated other existing materials into English. Whose copyright is in question? Eyagi (talk) 22:45, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Translator

Who translated Licensed prostitutes regulation order in Japan and Licensed brothel and prostitute regulation order in Korea under Japanese Empire, please?--Jusjih (talk) 18:54, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

I translated. Eyagi (talk) 23:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Please specify how to license your translations so both will go to English Wikisource soon. Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License and the GFDL, or else?--Jusjih (talk) 19:39, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice.

I am not familiar with copyright rules. My hope is to waive copyright so that anyone can freely access the site and correct any translation errors. Please, I hope you will choose the rule that fits my wishes. Eyagi (talk) 04:47, 2 October 2023 (UTC)