Page:Thesaurus Palaeohibernicus 2.djvu/122

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread.
76
Non-Biblical Glosses and Scholia.

P. 27a

Proprium est pro­nominis1 pro aliquo nomine proprio poni et certas personas signi­ficare. Ergo ‘quis’ et ‘qualis’ et ‘talis’ et ‘quantus’ …quae sunt…‘redditiua,’2 magis nomina sunt ap­pellanda quam pronomina…sub­stantiam…et quali­tatem3, quamuis generalem4, quod5 est suum nominis6, habent: nomina sunt igitur dicenda, quamuis7 declina­tionem pro­nominum habent quaedam ex eis. Non enim de­clinatio, sed uis et signi­ficatio8 unius­cuius­que partis est con­templanda: indif­ferenter enim9 multa et10 nomina modo pro­nominum et pronomina modo nominum inuenimus de­clinanda. Quod si de­clinatio facit iudicium[1]11 qualis12 sit dictio13 debent…parti­cipia14 in his putari… Ergo non de­clinatio, sed pro­prietas, est ex­cutienda15 signifi­cationis16.

…summatim17 de ceterarum quoque partium proprietate orationis per­currere.

Hoc ergo inter aduerbium et praepositionem est18, quod ad-


P. 27a

1: .i. issed sainreth pronominis aṡuidigud ar­an­mmaimm dílius ⁊ ní arindí dano nád­suidigthe som ar­an­mmaimm do­acalmach · ·   2: .i. érrethcha airindí asrenat frecrae dond immchomurc .i. Dofúasailcet animm­chomarc imme­chomarcar tri quis ⁊ qualis ⁊ quantus   3: .i. qualis ⁊ talis .i. inni ind folaid hísin4: .i. cenelaich etir maith ⁊ olc5: .i. proprium .i. ái6: .i. sainreth nanmmae torand folaid cen­chinniuth persine · ·   7: .i. quis ⁊ qui aris far diull nominis ataat innahí olchænae .i. quis[2] ⁊ talis   8: .i. afolad ⁊ inchiall9: .i. Nibí dechor etir diall nanmann ⁊ pro­nominum   10: cid11: masued sluindes ind rann12: .i. Cia randdatu bis indi13: .i. cisi rami dogéntar di14: ar is diall nominis lasuidib[3]15: .i. ní eclastai16: ind ḟolaid17: ind­áirmith ꝉ breuiter   18: .i. etir in­dobrethir són ɔicc bes ṅ do­briathar[4] ⁊ bes rem­suidigud ꝉ etir in­dobrethir sechissí ⁊ remsuidigud má­do­drume­natar alaaili nombetis in oen rainn · ·


P. 27a

1. i.e. this is the peculi­arity of the pronoun, that it is put for a proper noun, not, indeed, that it is not put for an appel­lative noun.   2. i.e. red­ditives, because they render an answer to the question, that is, they resolve the question which is asked by quis and qualis and quantus.   3. i.e. qualis and talis: (they have) the quality of that substance.   4. i.e. general, both good and bad.   6. i.e. the peculiar­ity of a noun, to denote substance without determin­ing person.   7. i.e. quis and qui (follow the pro­nominal declen­sion), for the rest, qualis and talis are (declined) according to the nominal declen­sion.   8. i.e. the substance and the sense.   9. i.e. there is no dif­ference between the de­clension of nouns and of pronouns.   10. also.   11. if it is this that the part (of speech) expresses.   12. i.e. what particu­larity[5] resides in it.   13. i.e. what part (of speech) will be made of it.   14. for they have the nominal declen­sion.   16. of the meaning.   17. numerical­ly or briefly.   18. i.e. between the adverb which can be an adverb and a prepo­sition. Or between any adverb what­so­ever and a prepo­sition, if some have thought that they are one part (of speech).

  1. recte indicium
  2. leg. qualis
  3. MS. hi suidib, with puncta delentia under hi and la super­scribed
  4. MS. dobre˘
  5. randatu is an abstract formation from rann ‘part of speech,’ cf. Sg. 188a7, 8, 203b4 etc.