Page:Thesaurus Palaeohibernicus 2.djvu/244

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has not been proofread.
198
Non-Biblical Glosses and Scholia.

p. 202a neque in alio casu^ eandem 'te' syllabae adiectionem inuenies. Nee non pluralis numeri additur 'met' casibus aliis absque genitiuo^...

'Pte' quoque ablatiuum trium posesiuorum pronominum inuenio asciscere^: 'meapte, tuapte, suapte'...

Sciendum tamen, quod 'met' et 'te' adduntur supra dictis 5 pronominibus uel discretionis causa* plerunque uel significantiae", ut Terentius :

(i. p. 592) Egomet® rapui,

intelligimus enim ' et ego et non alius'.'

P. 202b Haec igitur, hoc est 'met te pte ce' adiectiones esse ipse sensus^ lo (i. p. 593) arguit, qui nullus in his separatis potest inueniri^ : nihil enim compositum diuiditur, quod non cum separetur, quamuis sit ex corruptis, tamen haec eadem corrupta ab integris esse ostendit'... Ergo ' egomet, tute, suapte, huiusce ' minime dicenda sunt com- posita, quia additio, si separetur, nihil significare possit per se. ^5

(i. p. 594) .. aduerbia personas simul et numeros et casus in eodem habere non possunt^ Sunt enim quaedam personas significantia tantum, ...quaedam casus uidentur certos nominum habere'... Adeo autem non est idem dicere 'ecce' et 'eccum,' quod® 'ecce^' aduerbium


P. 202 a 1. .i. cenmithd innainmnid .i. tv _ 2. ar nitormagar frisuidi 20 3. .i. ceni tahair sem desimrecht acht arfemen tantura i 4. .i. do dechrugud persine frialaili 5. .i. dofoirhdet ni cenid ar c^omsuidigthib adrimter inna fortormach so .1. cinnit 7 dofoirndet dechrogod innapersine fri alaili • ^ 6. .. ni nach aile 7. .i. asmme moinur aridrochell • ar mad ego nammd asbevad hes nobed 25 nachaile leis oc inndairchellad amsd sodain •

P. 202 b 1. .i. fil indib 2. .i. nitechtat sens iarna netarscarad 3. .i. cid druailnide rhbes chechtar indarann mnc^omsuidigthiu adcuireddar doldni fritaidbech inchomsuidigthi sin • ivmafortdrmach ucut tmmurgu ni inchoisget sidi ni iarna mbrith onaib rannaib 3° frismbiat 4. .i, sech atd son in svp?"adictis 5. .i. ar c^osmailius tarmorcin 6. .i. ol 7. .i. as ecce


P. 202a 1. i.e. besides the nominative, tu. 2. for it is not added to this. 3. i.e. though he gives no example save only for the feminine. 4. i.e. to distinguish (one) person from another. 5. i.e. they signify 35 somewhat, though these additions are not reckoned as compounds, that is, they define and signify the distinction of the (one) person from another. 6. i.e. it is no other. 7. i.e. that it is I alone who have taken it away; for if he had said ego only, perchance another might have been with him at the taking away in that case. 4°

P. 202b 1. i.e. which is in them. 2. i.e. they have no meaning after their separation. 3. i.e. though each of the two parts in the com- pound be corrupt, they return to completeness at the breaking up of that compound. Yon increments, however, they do not signify anything after being taken from the parts of speech with which they are. 4, i.e. but 45 that is in the supradicta. 5. i.e. for similarity of termination.