Jump to content

Wikisource:Proposed deletions/Archive 2025

From Wikisource

This page collects done requests for deleting specific articles from Wikisource, 2025.

Other archives see here.


January 2025

[edit]

Out of project scope, obviously vandalism. --Quangdat201 (talk) 04:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 11:16, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope, obviously vandalism. --Quangdat201 (talk) 11:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 11:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spam from WMF-banned user - thank you in advance - Antandrus (talk) 16:41, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done Goodness, what a weird crank. —Justin (koavf)TCM 16:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Same as above. --Leonidlednev (talk) 19:28, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 19:30, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Empty category. 185.172.241.184 14:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 15:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope, possibility vandalism. --Quangdat201 (talk) 14:16, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 17:12, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope খাত্তাব হাসান (talk) 08:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 17:32, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong language, may be suitable for English Wikisource, out of project scope. --ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (talk) 22:11, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Multilingual works are perfectly appropriate to have here. If the community at en.ws would prefer it be hosted there, I have no objection, but it's within scope here. —Justin (koavf)TCM 01:11, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong language, may be suitable for English Wikisource, out of project scope.--ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (talk) 22:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Multilingual works are perfectly appropriate to have here. If the community at en.ws would prefer it be hosted there, I have no objection, but it's within scope here. —Justin (koavf)TCM 01:11, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spam. --Jan.Kamenicek (talk) 00:47, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 01:15, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism. PhilBrvni (talk) 11:38, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 16:31, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Test page. --Quangdat201 (talk) 11:34, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 17:34, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Test page. --Quangdat201 (talk) 11:34, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 17:34, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

[edit]

Out of project scope, obviously vandalism. --Quangdat201 (talk) 15:36, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 18:43, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Daklarata e Pavarësisë së Kosovës

[edit]

obvious duplicate of Deklarata e Pavarësisë së Kosovës with one letter off the title. Fallbackintoreality (talk) 21:06, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I just redirected. Is that enough? —Justin (koavf)TCM 21:34, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if it's a typo that happens nearly enough to warrant a redirect, but if you feel it's appropriate, then go for it! Fallbackintoreality (talk) 21:37, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know Albanian either, so I'm just guessing that it was a reasonable typo. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ —Justin (koavf)TCM 21:55, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pure vandalism (cross-wiki abuse) -- Miwako Sato (talk) 19:30, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 21:05, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spam. --Quangdat201 (talk) 05:16, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 05:23, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Test page. --Quangdat201 (talk) 05:18, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 05:23, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Test page. --Quangdat201 (talk) 05:20, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 05:23, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Empty page. --Quangdat201 (talk) 05:22, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 05:23, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

[edit]

Spam. --Quangdat201 (talk) 06:12, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 06:19, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Broken redirect. --Quangdat201 (talk) 05:44, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 05:53, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Broken redirect. --Quangdat201 (talk) 05:44, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 05:53, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Broken redirect. --Quangdat201 (talk) 05:44, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 05:53, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope, obviously vandalism. --Quangdat201 (talk) 12:40, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 18:24, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please delete if it doesn't fit into your norms. Janavigyan (talk) 01:32, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism. --Quangdat201 (talk) 02:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 02:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spam and out of scope. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:35, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 22:54, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

[edit]

Please move them to zh.ws. Still Digging.--Zhxy 519 (talk) 16:22, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For the first work, zh.ws redirects to here. Are we sure that they will host these? I'm totally ignorant of literary Chinese, so I struggle to understand what's happening here. —Justin (koavf)TCM 16:26, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Their copyrights should be expired (if no please let zh editors investigate in zh.ws). And the first redirect can be deleted, if technically necessary. Also, please move all the subpages as well. Zhxy 519 (talk) 17:15, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Koavf: Temporarily keep them as having Main_Page/lzh means the need to invite Chinese Wikisource to discuss how to handle them. Furthermore, Zhxy 519 still has major problems on Chinese Wikisource per Wikisource:Scriptorium/Archives/2024#User not here to build a better free library, so better wait until settling the highly questionable adminship of Zhxy 519 that Chinese Wikisource is negotiating now. We cannot appreciate Zhxy 519's non-copyright proposed deletions as long as he monopolize the deadminship of Chinese Wikisource.--Jusjih (talk) 17:29, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What’s wrong with you? Don’t mix irrelevant issues together. I sincerely invite @Koavf to make your opinion, please ignore Jusjih’s unprofessional words. Zhxy 519 (talk) 17:34, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Zhxy, can we please lower the temp a little in this conversation? Jusjih, same?
Do we have any signal from zh.ws that they want to host lzh source texts? If not, I can do the outreach with anyone bilingual. —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:50, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As a zh.ws admin, I can tell you that zh.ws has always been hosting lzh texts. A proof is that the pages in lzh like 分类:政書 is using all "zh:". If you still need a community consensus, I'm getting it. Zhxy 519 (talk) 22:02, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I trust you and if you import these texts, then I will delete them here. You should be able to import at s:zh:Special:Import. Let me know if there are any issues. —Justin (koavf)TCM 22:07, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, on it. And as I'm still digging, I'll let you know when further ones found. Zhxy 519 (talk) 22:17, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jusjih: I can't speak to internal zh.ws drama. As long as someone is an admin there, I just have to trust that the community there is competent to police itself until/unless I know otherwise. If Zhxy imports these texts to zh.ws, I will delete the local copies. If the copies there are deleted, I will undelete here so that we can host them. —Justin (koavf)TCM 22:09, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Koavf: I see it in the same way. Draco flavus (talk) 20:17, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Chinese Wikisource always accepts literary Chinese content. The main reason why it redirects here is a decision by WMF LangCom at m:Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Literary_Chinese#Proposed_rules_for_LZH_in_Multilingual_Wikisource:
We also don't want Chinese Wikisource to sabotage this effort by copying content in from Multilingual Wikisource and claiming it should not belong in Multilingual Wikisource.
The decision may have been irrelevant because 5 years have passed since that decision, but currently there’s no consensus on that. Midleading (talk) 02:50, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Now all these works are exported to zh.ws. Please delete them all including subpages. Zhxy 519 (talk) 03:40, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done. If Author:王夫之, 搔首問, and 相宗絡索 or any other pages can be ported over, let me know and I will delete local copies. —Justin (koavf)TCM 04:14, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am abstaining on this section now.--Jusjih (talk) 00:26, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious vandalism. Fathoms Below (talk) 04:19, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- (talk) 05:53, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism. --Quangdat201 (talk) 15:47, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done --(talk) 18:20, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now on subdomain s:th:ประกาศสำนักนายกรัฐมนตรี เรื่อง พระราชทานยศทหาร ลงวันที่ ๖ มิถุนายน พ.ศ. ๒๕๑๖. --Quangdat201 (talk) 16:16, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done --(talk) 18:20, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All works moved to subdomain pl:Autor:Julian Tuwim. Michalg95 (talk) 09:39, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following subpages are listed for discussion: Author:Julian_Tuwim/de and Author:Julian_Tuwim/en. --(talk) 14:51, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 16:38, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope, obviously vandalism. --Quangdat201 (talk) 05:25, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 06:57, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

[edit]

This page is in the deletion category for a long time, but I cannot make a good judgement myself. Apparently, this has to do with copyright. --Ooswesthoesbes (talk) 17:57, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This should be kept here. First off, this was published across several years, but that was a long time ago, so it's very likely that anyone who worked on it died a very long time ago and it's in the public domain in its place of publication (Poland) and it's certainly in the public domain in the United States. That said, we don't need to follow Polish law anyway. —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:37, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Scan quality

[edit]

Index:What Women Should Know.djvu is too blurry to read, and so it's useless and should be deleted. Eievie (talk) 07:56, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such indexhere, it's on en subdomain. Michalg95 (talk) 13:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope, obviously vandalism. --Quangdat201 (talk) 02:34, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 02:58, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope, obviously vandalism. --Quangdat201 (talk) 03:03, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 06:16, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Contains poem in Russian, not in Tajik. Таёжный лес (talk) 08:13, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can this be hosted at ru.ws? —Justin (koavf)TCM 08:27, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It is already. Таёжный лес (talk) 14:56, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 20:51, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

[edit]

Export or delete this unused file?--Jusjih (talk) 03:57, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't read Burmese, but based on looking at translations online and the lack of any source or licensing information makes me feel like deletion is warranted. If there's some reason to un-delete or someone needs to view it, let me know. —Justin (koavf)TCM 04:36, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Tibetan text with no clear source. There's already a deletion discussion of a supposed English translation at the English Wikisource, here.

I have many concerns about the authenticity of even the original, untranslated page:

  1. A massive amount of text has been added recently to the transcription, post-deletion discussion at enWS. Where did that come from? I have no idea.
  2. A Google verbatim search for Tibetan phrases within the text come up with nothing: example.
  3. An LLM called perplexity.ai was admitted to being used for formatting of the text here and at English Wikisource, but it's not clear to what extent the LLM was used. To be clear, I'm not anti-AI like a lot of people are nowadays, but I still hope that an LLM wasn't used to generate this entire text from nothing, or that would be blatantly inauthentic.

What exactly is this work? Is it entirely user-generated? AI-generated? A transcription of an older text (which is what it should be if it's here)? No transparency has been given that I can see, and it concerns me to even keep this here. I do not speak Tibetan, but perhaps someone more familiar with that culture / history can check this situation out? SnowyCinema (talk) 12:25, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pecha-Gade: I think the above is a very compelling case for deletion. Can you please answer SnowyCinema's questions above? —Justin (koavf)TCM 12:43, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Koavf: Over on enWS, Pecha admitted to the work being a copyvio even in the original Tibetan language, and the translation was speedied there on those ground. So, could you speedy it here too, now? SnowyCinema (talk) 17:30, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 18:09, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

[edit]

Out of project scope. --Quangdat201 (talk) 11:06, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 17:42, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope. --Quangdat201 (talk) 08:17, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 08:28, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Recreated, please salt. --Quangdat201 (talk) 14:08, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 17:50, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope. --Quangdat201 (talk) 06:38, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 16:13, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope. --Quangdat201 (talk) 06:40, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 16:16, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope. --Quangdat201 (talk) 06:40, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 16:16, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope. --Quangdat201 (talk) 04:21, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ. --Quangdat201 (talk) 08:23, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No useful content. --Quangdat201 (talk) 04:21, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ. --Quangdat201 (talk) 08:23, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. --Quangdat201 (talk) 04:21, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ. --Quangdat201 (talk) 08:23, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. --Quangdat201 (talk) 04:21, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ. --Quangdat201 (talk) 08:23, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spam. --Quangdat201 (talk) 15:08, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ. --Quangdat201 (talk) 08:23, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Test page. --Quangdat201 (talk) 15:08, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ. --Quangdat201 (talk) 08:23, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Test page. --Quangdat201 (talk) 15:12, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ. --Quangdat201 (talk) 08:23, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

[edit]

No useful content. --Quangdat201 (talk) 08:24, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 17:14, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No useful content. --Quangdat201 (talk) 02:22, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 02:49, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism. Aqurs1 (talk) 18:47, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 19:49, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope. --Quangdat201 (talk) 15:04, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 15:05, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Test page. --Quangdat201 (talk) 15:04, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 15:06, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spam. --Quangdat201 (talk) 15:06, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 15:07, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

[edit]

Out of project scope. --Quangdat201 (talk) 02:31, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 02:32, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope. --Quangdat201 (talk) 07:14, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 18:17, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

[edit]

Orphaned documentation.--WEBridge (talk) 22:23, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 01:28, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism. --Quangdat201 (talk) 13:16, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 16:12, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No useful content. --Quangdat201 (talk) 13:18, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 16:13, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spam. --Quangdat201 (talk) 04:03, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 05:15, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spam. --Quangdat201 (talk) 02:44, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 03:23, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

[edit]

Vandalism. -- Jan.Kamenicek (talk) 15:57, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 17:15, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism. --Quangdat201 (talk) 02:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 06:16, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism. --Quangdat201 (talk) 11:42, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 22:32, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism. --Quangdat201 (talk) 11:42, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJustin (koavf)TCM 22:32, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope. --Quangdat201 (talk) 02:51, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

December 2025

[edit]

Content or redirect pages with incorrect titles. TongcyDai (talk) 21:49, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Ooswesthoesbes (talk) 15:59, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]