Wikisource:Proposed deletions
From Wikisource
This page collects requests for deleting specific articles from Wikisource. If you want a page deleted for copyright reasons please list it at Wikisource:Possible copyright violations. If you think a page should be deleted for any other reason, please list it here so it can be discussed. Articles remaining on this page should be deleted if there is no significant opposition. Use {{delete}}.
See also Category:Deletion requests
Contents |
[edit] October 2006
Please note that Category:Edmeston, New York Images have lots of images never moved to en. 555 16:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- it is difficult to do something, as there are mostly no sources and licences giver; probably it can be PD, but commons would not keep them I am afraid. -jkb- 08:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- I will try to have a look when I get the time. Mainwhile if somebody else want to do it, go! ;o) Yann 00:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- it is difficult to do something, as there are mostly no sources and licences giver; probably it can be PD, but commons would not keep them I am afraid. -jkb- 08:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete all that have no source and no license, especially if they're also unused. —Angr 11:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] August 2009
- Intêrnacyjanal and Category:Czornaruski - non-existent language as far as I can tell. —Angr 19:26, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- See #Delete the project Czornaruski here above (I guess I delete it soon anyway), regards -jkb- 19:37, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
-
deleted -jkb- 09:00, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- Great; could you also delete Broken/cz:Intêrnacyjanal, which is a redirect to the now deleted page? —Angr 06:35, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
- Done, --LadyInGrey 03:05, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
[edit] October 2009
[edit] Ou Apostoliese Kerk
This isn't a text, only a collection of links (both internal and external). Anrie 13:58, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- deleted. – Innv 09:07, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Ds. Denzel Dick: Wat elkeen van die Ou Apostel-kerk moet wees
- Source: [1])
This text is copied from a self-publication. Besides that, the source text makes no claim that it is in the public domain or that it is available under a free license (but even if it was, it would still not qualify for inclusion, since it does not seem to have appeared in a medium that includes peer review or editorial controls and is purely an expression of opinion. Anrie 08:25, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Ria De Vos: Die Ou Apostoliese Kerk
- Source: [2]
This text is from a forum posting. It has not been published in a medium that includes peer review or editorial controls and is purely an expression of opinion. It also makes no claim that it is available under a free license or has been released into the public domain. I would suggest the information be inserted into a Wikipedia article (the text discusses the Old Apostolic Church), but the source wouldn't even qualify as a reliable one. Anrie 08:29, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
